33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives with the police is usually to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and above all, make certain regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair to the offender as well as the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, but they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by legislation." It is actually effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the figured out counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession in the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to become decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this part for interim custody of the subject premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
The loads of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it's made apparent that police is free to choose action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities topic to legislation. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. Should the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and so they shall be assigned non-discipline duties inside the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as set forth would not use, as being the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, instead he has become acquitted from the criminal charges based on evidence and it is properly-settled regulation that once the civil servant is acquitted in the criminal case, then on this quite charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment via the department and held him disqualified to the post because acquittal for all future purposes. The aforesaid proposition is established at naught from the Supreme Court of Pakistan inside the case with the District Police Officer Mainwali and a pair of others v.
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Allow the decision stand"—is definitely the principle by which judges are bound to this kind of past decisions, drawing on recognized judicial authority to formulate their positions.
Within the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court would be the highest court while in the United States. Decreased courts over the federal level incorporate the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, plus the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related to the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that involve parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Each and every state has its very own judicial system that involves trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Just about every state is commonly referred to given that the “supreme” court, Whilst there are a few exceptions to this rule, for example, the Big apple Court of Appeals or perhaps the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state legislation and regulations, Though state courts may additionally generally listen to cases involving federal laws.
Numerous judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of a crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in inserting the Petitioner's name to the ECL based on the criminal case are inconsistent with recognized legal principles. For that reason, this petition must be allowed Read more
The DCFS social worker in charge with the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-month report into the court, the worker elaborated within the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, aiding you in understanding the intricacies of land and property law.
Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated previously mentioned. However no harassment shall be caused to both party as well as the case shall be decided with the competent court of legislation if pending. Read more
The different roles of case regulation in civil and common legislation traditions create differences in the best way that courts render decisions. Common legislation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale driving their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and infrequently interpret the wider legal principles.
Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there may be a single or more judgments provided (or reported). Only the reason for your decision from the majority can represent a binding precedent, but all may be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning might be adopted in an argument.
States also normally have courts that take care of only a specific subset of legal matters, which include family regulation and probate. Case law, also known as precedent or common law, may be the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending about the relationship between the deciding court plus the precedent, case legislation could possibly be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision because of the U.S. Court of Appeals with the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal alien enemy case law district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting down in California (whether a federal or state court) is not strictly bound to follow the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by 1 district court in Ny just isn't binding on another district court, but the original court’s reasoning may possibly help guide the second court in reaching its decision. Decisions through the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more